|
In 1991, the Board of Regents adopted a new document
entitled, A New Compact for Learning. It provided a
rationale for systemic educational reform and a vision for
learning-centered schools. The Compact was an agreement,
signed by parents, students, business, labor, education, and
government representatives throughout New York State. They agreed to
commit their energies to raise academic standards for learning and
for student achievement.
Outlined in A New Compact for Learning, is the State’s role
to collaborate with teachers, administrators, parents, and others
interested in education to stimulate and support locally-developed
curriculum by focusing on achievement results and by creating a
curriculum framework.
This
newly created curriculum framework painted a coherent K-12 vision of
curriculum by: a) articulating desired
English
Language Arts (ELA) learning standards for students, b)
suggesting the key concepts and competencies related to those
standards, and c) describing the criteria for success at several
points on a continuum of achievement. The framework was based on
education research, the science of child development, and effective
teaching practices.
Learning standards, within the curriculum framework, were defined as
“the knowledge, skills, and understandings that individuals can and
do habitually demonstrate over time as a consequence of instruction
and experience.” This emphasis on habitual performance suggested
that what learners do in varied contexts over time is more important
than isolated demonstrations of learning.
The ELA
learning standards provided a common lens for observing, assessing,
and reporting authentic language use at different stages of
development. Together with the criteria that characterize competent
performance, these standards were intended to assist teachers in
monitoring growth in language achievement, in using common
vocabulary for describing that growth, and in developing plans for
nurturing that growth.
The NYS
learning standards for ELA focus on the skills of reading, writing,
listening, and speaking. Students are expected to read and
experience a wide range of genre as part of the learning process.
The standards are as follows:
Standard 1
Students will read, write, listen, and speak for information and
understanding.
Standard 2
Students will read, write, listen, and speak for literary response
and expression.
Standard 3
Students will read, write, listen, and speak for critical analysis
and evaluation.
Standard 4
Students will read, write, listen, and speak for social
interaction.
The
shift from a focus on course content, as provided for through
traditional syllabi, to student performance, in the form of content
and performance standards, allowed for greater flexibility in
instruction while keeping instructional uniformity. Each teacher
was encouraged to teach their students using whatever instructional
materials they chose and to use the instructional style and methods
that were most suitable for their learners as long as the learners
exhibited the knowledge, skills, and behaviors listed in the
standards as the end-product of instruction.
One
measure of student growth in ELA is accomplished through the system
of State assessments. Assessment is designed to identify, monitor
and report learning that is occurring in the schools. The ELA
assessments focus on students’ actual performances as readers,
writers, and listeners and are directly connected to curriculum and
instructional practice through the performance indicators.
Each
item on a New York State ELA test, whether a multiple choice
question, short response or extended response, is linked to a
performance indicator(s) of the learning standards. Collectively,
the items are listed on an item map. Each item map has the number
of the item as it appeared on the test and its corresponding
learning standard and performance indicator. The item map for each
test can be found on the
Office of State Assessment website. Reading the item map and
comparing the performance indicator with the test question yields
important information for both instructional program improvements
and increased student achievement.
The
federal
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) requires further
changes in NYS’s standards and the State assessment program. This
legislation calls for each State to:
- have or develop grade
specific content expectations in reading, for each of grades 3-8.
NYS was a forerunner in setting higher expectations (learning
standards) and creating a comprehensive set of standards for ELA.
The ELA
Resource Guide with Core Curriculum was developed to provide
more specific guidance to the education community on student
expectations. This document delineates performance indicators in
two-year grade bands. In response to NCLB, NYS will update the core
to provide annual performance indicators prekindergarten through
twelfth grade.
- measure every public school
student’s progress in reading in each of grades three through 8
and at least once during grades 10 through 12.
Prior to NCLB, New York State tested students in grade four and
eight to determine student success in achieving State standards. In
response to NCLB, grade level assessments will be developed to
measure the performance indicators in grades 3-8.
- provide instruction by using
practices that research has shown to be successful.
Instructional practices, which
meet these federal requirements, will be shared statewide through
the NYS Virtual
Learning System.
As
initiated in A New Compact for Learning, the State views the
education as a collaborative process and continue to value its
relationship with students, parents, educators and the community to
strengthen the teaching and learning process for all students. |